Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 06:18
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Brad Pitt and Tim Cook surprise fans at Apple Fifth Avenue ahead of ‘F1 The Movie’ release - 9to5Mac
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What was your wildest experience as a lesbian?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
In your humble opinion, why does the narcissist mistake kindness for weakness in some people?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Study shows that early humans climbed trees and worked with stone - Earth.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What do you CPAP users do to keep your mouth closed during sleep using a nasal pillow?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
49ers trade a 2026 conditional fifth-round pick for Bryce Huff - NBC Sports
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Harvard study says Vitamin D may actually slow down aging - Times of India
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Do women like watching men sucking men?
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.